The Net Promoter Score (NPS)—a simple yet powerful tool—can provide actionable insights that drive growth, enhance brand loyalty, and improve overall customer satisfaction.
In the pharmaceutical industry, NPS remains significantly underutilised. Yet, it can be used as a highly effective KPI for engagement as explained by CELforPharma’s faculty of the Strategic Omnichannel for Medical Affairs and Strategic Omnichannel for Pharma Marketing courses.
The Net Promoter Score (NPS) is a widely recognised metric that measures customer loyalty and satisfaction by asking a single question:
“On a scale from 0 to 10, how likely are you to recommend our product or service to a colleague or peer?”
Based on their responses, customers are categorised into:
The formula is simple: NPS = % Promoters – % Detractors
The result varies between -100% and +100%. The value is used as an indicator for growth.
Pharma companies, too, can benefit from this robust KPI. They can and should use it wherever they deal with external stakeholders to motivate their market-facing teams to improve stakeholder loyalty and word-of-mouth.
Here is an example:
Assume you organise a webinar for your HCPs. At the end of the webinar, you ask the following question to the participants: “On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is not at all likely and 10 is extremely likely, how likely is it that you would recommend this webinar to your colleagues?”
You get the following responses:
Webinar A | |
Dr Pinchard | 9 |
Dr Jacobson | 8 |
Dr Roccato | 7 |
Dr Lane | 10 |
Dr Carlino | 7 |
Dr Chaumette | 6 |
Dr Van Geyt | 9 |
Dr Tasset | 8 |
Dr Toh | 7 |
Dr Kotecha | 8 |
In webinar A, you have the following responses:
The NPS of the webinar is + 20%
So, what does this mean?
The audience of the webinar will be net promoters of your webinar (more promoters than detractors), which is likely to generate more interest from other HCPs in the future. Following up with Promoters can generate testimonials and/or referrals.
The focus for next time is on increasing the % of Promoters, by decreasing the % of Detractors and/or “nudging” the group of Passives to become Promoters, which will increase NPS over time.
Now assume you got the following responses on another webinar you organised:
Webinar B | |
Dr Gabriel | 10 |
Dr Jenkins | 9 |
Dr Malinen | 5 |
Dr Smedt | 6 |
Dr Taylor | 10 |
Dr Woolley | 6 |
Dr Mirkovic | 10 |
Dr Johnson | 9 |
Dr Pfeiffer | 9 |
Dr Huguet | 4 |
The NPS of this webinar is also + 20%. So, at first glance, both webinars performed equally well. But because NPS is a summary statistic, you should dig deeper: